Although not directly involved, Chinese supporters are fiercely debating the CAS ruling allowing 7 Malaysian players to play temporarily.
The decision by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to permit 7 Malaysian naturalized players to compete temporarily while awaiting the final verdict has sparked strong reactions among Chinese football fans. Despite having no direct connection to the case, many Chinese supporters are closely following the developments, partly due to the sensitive nature and partly because the issue has attracted widespread attention across Asian football. On major sports forums, numerous opinions express dissatisfaction and skepticism about the fairness, while also questioning the management and accountability of the Football Association of Malaysia.
Some Chinese fans have been critical of the FAM's handling of the matter, believing Malaysia has put itself in a difficult position. Many comments show direct criticism, such as the opinion: “The Football Association of Malaysia should take full responsibility for this incident!”. This perspective reveals a lack of sympathy for procedural errors in naturalization, regardless of CAS’s temporary suspension of the suspension.
Additionally, some view the CAS decision as merely a procedural and temporary measure that does not address the core issue. One Chinese fan commented: “This is probably just a temporary suspension of their individual bans. Malaysia seems to punish whoever they want however they want.” This phrasing implies doubts about the strictness of football governance, suggesting that penalties might be “flexibly” applied due to factors beyond the sport itself.
Notably, many Chinese fans approach the issue from the angle of sports ethics and the genuine ability of the naturalized players. One opinion that received much interaction stated: “This ruling indeed brings a glimmer of hope for Malaysian football, but the ethical boundaries regarding naturalized players still need to be seriously considered. After all, the game on the field must be played with real skill to create exciting moments.” This view reflects concerns about taking shortcuts in football development.
At the regional governance level, the AFC also expressed surprise when CAS approved the temporary suspension of a 12-month ban, a very rare occurrence. The AFC Secretary-General noted that CAS’s criteria are usually strict, and the suspension opens up roughly a 50-50 chance for the appeal’s outcome. This context has further fueled Chinese fans' debates, as the case not only involves Malaysia but could set a precedent for player eligibility disputes in Asia.