Recently, Doinb issued an apology, and fans collectively expressed their dissatisfaction, saying: I have to apologize for the first time I won the game, the cause of the incident was that after NIP defeated IG, Doinb caused controversy because of the remarks of "making black fans kneel" in the interview, and issued an apology under the pressure of netizens' dissatisfaction, admitting that the words were inappropriate.

The incident left his fans indignant, believing that it was unfair to be forced to apologize for words after winning the match, and it also sparked multiple discussions about the words and actions of the players and online violence.

First of all, from Doinb's point of view, his speech may be an emotional catharsis after a long-term cyberattack, but as a professional player, his words and actions are placed in the public eye, and too direct or emotional expressions will inevitably lead to controversy.

Especially in the high-profile field of esports, where players not only represent individuals, but also carry the expectations of clubs and fans, his apology reflects a clear recognition of identity and influence, as well as a manifestation of a professional attitude.

However, the underlying reasons behind this over-the-top rhetoric cannot be ignored, as online violence by black fans is a common problem faced by many players, and Doinb's response, while inappropriate, reflects the enormous pressure brought by this issue.

Overall, this incident reflects the dual dilemma of words and actions of players in the esports circle and online violence. Do you have anything to say about the future, where players and fans alike should seek a more rational and healthy way to interact and avoid burying the competitive spirit in endless controversy?