In the current digital entertainment ecosystem, many influencers have been permanently banned for inappropriate words and actions or violating platform rules, but paradoxically, some influencers have easily made a comeback by changing platforms to regain attention and traffic.

This phenomenon has sparked extensive discussions, and also revealed a series of problems in platform regulation and influencer management, firstly, there is often a certain ambiguity in the implementation standards and transparency of platform blocking systems.

Some influencers have been banned for radical remarks, violating community rules, and more, but the decision has not been fully explained publicly, making it difficult for viewers and other creators to clarify the criteria.

On the other hand, platforms are more dependent on content creators, especially Internet celebrities with huge traffic often bring huge advertising revenue, so even if it is a violation, it may be difficult to completely "block" it because of "commercial interests".

Secondly, the phenomenon of changing platforms and making a comeback exposes the fragmentation of industry supervision and the inconsistency between platforms, and the management of Internet celebrities on different platforms is different.

For example, the anchor "Hesitant Male God", who was recently permanently banned by a certain sound, suddenly returned, made a comeback on a different platform, appeared in a certain hand, and has not been banned yet, many netizens expressed dissatisfaction with this, I don't know how to deal with it in the end, do you have anything to complain about this?