72 points in 2 games! Make history! Let's admit it, SGA is unique in this year's finals

Finals G2.

The Thunder can't afford to lose two straight games at home and head to Indiana with a 0-2 scoreline.

They haven't lost in a row in this year's playoffs.

Today's result is indeed a strong rebound to defend the home field.

123-107。

Alexander 34 points, 5 rebounds, 8 assists and 4 steals, Caruso 20 points, 3 rebounds and 1 assist, Jalenway 19 points, 5 rebounds and 5 assists, Wiggins 18 points, 4 rebounds and 1 assist, Holmgren 15 points and 6 boards.

Haliburton had 17 points, 3 rebounds and 6 assists, Turner 16 points, 4 rebounds and 4 assists, Siakam 15 points, 7 rebounds, 4 assists and 2 blocks, Nesmith 14 points and 4 boards, Mathurin 14 points, 2 rebounds and 1 assist, Nembhard 11 points, 4 rebounds, 4 assists and 3 steals, and McConaughey 11 points, 3 rebounds, 6 assists and 2 steals.

Today's outside shooting percentage is 38.9% for the Thunder and 35% for the Pacers.

Indiana's quasi-four-game mission cannot be done in two consecutive games.

You can't go crazy because of a lore to "whip the corpse" Brother Di's poisonous milk prediction.

There is no doubt that the Thunder are the more capable side in the finals, and as long as they are more cautious and do not roll over, they have a better chance of winning.

OKC needs to learn the hard lesson of the last 0.3 seconds.

Watching a game, you won't just watch Haliburton's final blow, after all, you can't just eat the tenth steamed bun and eat yourself full.

Forget that magical goal, where did the Thunder lose last time?

Here are a few key elements:

1. Walkers are accurate.

He shot 18-of-39 from three-point range and shot 46.2 percent from three-point range. He took 16 fewer shots in total, but hit seven more three-pointers than the Thunder.

Second, the thunder did not hold back the opponent's momentum.

The Pacers had too many offensive points, from Nesmith to Turner, Siakam, Nembhard, and Toppin, giving Harry enough support.

3. Dagneault's decision-making mistakes.

At 3:24 in the fourth quarter, Wallace replaced Holmgren, and the five-man lineup was outscored by the Pacers 13-4.

Fourth, Holmgren's aberration.

In G1, he only scored 6 points, and he was in a state of confusion on the court.

So what is the response and adjustment of the thunder?

In the face of the Pacers' "backlash", he is more sensitive.

Defensively intensity.

Seeing Siakam hit two? Okay, come on this live Caruso.

Bald Mamba, that's so easy to use...

Where do the Pacers lose?

Quite simply, as you would have expected at the end of the game, the magic failed.

Don't look at Harry, who also scored 17 points, but most of the scores belong to "the child dies before the milk comes".

The first three quarters can be said to be the performance of the next meal. He shot 2-of-7 (1-of-5 from three-point range), had 5 points, 3 rebounds, 4 assists, 2 steals and 1 block, and had 3 turnovers, with a plus/minus of -7.

G1 lore into a fairy tale, G2 directly becomes dumb.

He's not like this once.

Not overestimated, not underestimated, but difficult to assess... Maybe the next one will be back.

When we marvel at his four shots in the playoffs this year, when we marvel at the Pacers' comebacks again and again, have we ever asked why we always have to play to the end? No one wants to be so thrilling and make the fans pinch eggs, right?

The core is that Haliburton's stability is not enough, and his ability to carry out the bottom line is not strong. He can be the icing on the cake, but when it comes to helping in the snow, he's not as good as Sika.

On the other hand, SGA on the other side, taking 30 points is like playing...

It's a star-level gap.

It is worth mentioning thatAlexander scored 72 points in the first two games of the NBA Finals, the highest in the first two games of a player's career.

The previous record was 71 points set by Allen Iverson in 2001.

You can hate his style of play, but I have to say, it's really strong.

In terms of ability, SGA is ahead of others in this year's finals.

Competitive sports are consequentialism.

From the perspective of the Pacers, to be able to "steal" an away game and return home with a 1-1 score is considered to be a good mission.

No matter how many minutes and seconds the Thunder led in total, the score was 1-1.

The next two games are an important watershed in the finals.

It went from 4 wins in 7 games to 3 wins in 5 games.

If the Pacers want to pull off a miracle, they need to hope that Haliburton pulls the gate less often and that other players make more accurate three-point shots...

That's the core of the story.

Under normal analysis, there is no doubt about who has the advantage.

However, the walker is too abnormal...